January 14, 196A
<br />
<br /> FOR TEE .PURPOSE OF RAISING REVENUE FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PUBLIC FREE SCHOOLS
<br />AND TO PAY IN:r~:~EST AN])SINKING FUND ON TRE PUBLIC DEBT~ FOR THE ,WAR BEGINNING JANUARY :t~ 196:4"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Dillon, the ordinance was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Smith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dillon,. Es.ares, Knight, Leafy
<br />~ays: None
<br />
<br />63-295 - The following ordinance, approved on first re~ding a:t last meeting, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING TAXES ON SHARES. OF STOCK-OF ~BANKS LOCATED. IN THE .CITY OF
<br />PORTSMOUTH FOR THE YEAR 1964 AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, FIXING THE RATE AND
<br />REQUIRING THE PAYMENT THEREOF, REQUIRING CERTAIN. REPORTS, AND PRESCRIBING 'PENALTIES
<br />FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr Barnes, the ordinance was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: ~mith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dillon, Eastes, Knight, Leafy
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />63-296 - The following ordinance,~ approved on ~irs~ reading at last meeting,, ~as taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO A~ND SECTION ~4-9 OF TNE CODE OF THE CITY, OF-PORTS~OUTH~
<br />VIRGINIA, 1961, TO ESTABLISH THE RATE FOR WAITING TI~E TO BE CHARGE~ BY
<br />TAXICABS AT ~EN CENTS FOR EACH TWO MINUTES OR FRACTION THEREOF"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr.~ Eastes, the ordinance was .adopted. a~duby the f,ollowing v.ote:J
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith~ A~kinson, Barrze, s~ Dillon, East,es, KKight, L~ary
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />63-297 - The following ordinance, approved on first reading a~ la~z meeting, was-taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE ,CREATING A CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF~THE CITY~ OF PORTSMOUTE
<br />AND PROVIDING FOR THE COMPOSITION AND DUTIES THEREOF AND OTHER-Nz~TTERS I~ERTAINING
<br />THERETO"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Leafy, the.ordinance was adop%ed, and by the following, vote:
<br />
<br /> - -- Ayes: Smith, Atkinson,~ Barnes, Dillon, Ea~tes, Kaight,~ Le~ry~. Nays: None
<br />
<br />63-298 - The following Qsdi~ance, approved on first reading at last meeting', was taken up and read~
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE ~0 APPROPRIATE $250,000. O0 FROM THE GENERAl. CAPITAL · IMPROI~ENfENT FUND
<br />FOR THE PURPOSE OF.MAKING THEANNUALLOSS OF REVENUE=PAYMENT TO NORFOLK~OUNTY-UNDER
<br />THE ANNEXATION ORDER DATED AUGUST 20, 1959"
<br />
<br />Ommotion of M~. Knight, the ordinance was adopted, and,by Ohe~foLlowing ~ote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dillan~..~as~, Knight, Lesr~
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br /> . . NEW BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> 64-6 - The following communication from 5he Planning Director was'read:
<br />
<br /> "At its regular monthly meeting Qu Januarys?, ~964,~ t~elCi~y Planning Commission unsnimott~ly
<br />resolved to recommend that the following p~vqgl o~ city-owne~.proper~y be declared sumptus and placed on public
<br />auction: . .
<br /> That tract of land bounded on the wes~ by the Olive Branch Cemetery, on ~he south by Clifford
<br />Street, on-the ~ast by Bsines Creek, ~a~d on the north by s tidal gu~ forming the boundary of City Park.~'
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Knight t~hat the Ci~ty Manager, be au~hor.i~e4 ~to ad~e~tise,~.the surpl~us proper~y for
<br />sale was adopted, without dissenting vote. :
<br />
<br /> 64--7 - The following communication item the Ptsn~ing D~i~eQtor Was 'read:
<br />
<br /> "At .it~ r~gular' m~*}t~eeting or~.January 7, 1964. the City Planming ~ommi:ssion publicly heard
<br />and acted on the following rezoning a~ppliceti, ons:
<br /> Z-64-2 Petition of Robert F. Babb ~o rez,~e the southwest corner 'of Elmh~rst Lane and Portsmouth
<br />Boulevard ~ronti-ng 543' on ortsmouih Bdhlevard; from Residential R-?5-S to Commercial C-2. The ,~Commissiou
<br />resolved unanimously not ~o recommend approval of this application. T~e Commission feels that this volume~ of
<br />Commercial C-2 in this particular areal is not warranted and that the ~plie.~nts ~id:not offer any jt~stification
<br />for such rezoning. The Commission feels that the corner in question/co~uld be used satisfactorily for si~41e
<br />family kome developmen~ pursuan~ to its current zo~g sta~us~ The Com~issf~n has eond~ueted- a lengthy study of
<br />land use and zoning along this portion, of Po~tSmouth~B~utevard sckedut~=d for ~jor improvemen~ i~ 1964, did on
<br />
<br />
<br />
|