|
On mo~ibn of Mr
<br />
<br />May 12, 1964
<br />
<br />Knight the recommendation~of the~ City Manager Was approved.
<br />
<br /> UNFINI SHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br />64-83 - The following ordinance,, approved on first reading at l'ast.meetlng,~ ' .was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $~,O00.00 FROM THE BOND FUND FOR THE PURPOSE OF
<br />C0MPLET~NG CONS~UCTION OF A W~T~R STORAGE' TAX"
<br />
<br />. On motion of. Mr. Dillon, the ordinance, was adopted, and by the following.vo~e.:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dill6n, Kflight, Leary
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />64-85 - The following ordinance,, appr~d om first readihg at last meeting, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />'~AN.0RDt~ANCE TO AMEND SECTION 10 OF ARTICLE I OF THE LICENSE TAN ORDINANC~O~
<br />THE cITY OF PORTSMOUTH, 19B0~ ~EgTA~NI~G T° LICENSE TAX WHEN NOT PREVIOUSLY IN
<br />BUSINESS A FULL YEAR"
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Knight,. the ordinance was adopted, and By the following vo~e:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dillon, Knight', Leary ' ' ~
<br /> N~ys': Nome .
<br />
<br /> 64-67 - The foliowin~ ~rdinance, on which actiom wns deferred Until this mee~img, ~as taken ~p
<br /> an~ read: ~ ' : " ~ '
<br />
<br /> "AN 0m)INANCg TO AME~rO'SECTtON 97 OF ~aTICLE Ii 0F T~ LIC~NSE T~ O~NASCE
<br /> 0F T~ CI~ oF .~RTS~OU~H, I960, ~TAINING ~ ~I~R CA~S"' ~
<br />
<br /> On. motiQ~, pFivi!eg~ of the floor was gra~%ed.
<br />
<br /> Donal~ Kil~ore, Do~ald'~Samdie amd Stanley Bang~l, a~torneys f6r trailer cour~s,~spoke,
<br />requesting a fu~ther~9~i8 O~that they might present an alternag~ proposal with regard ~o licenses' ~or
<br />trailer camps
<br />
<br /> On motion of ~. Knight, the con~i~erarion of this matter was delayed in~0rd~r that a proposal
<br />could be submitted for consideratiom by the City Ma~er mhd' City Attorney.
<br />
<br /> 6~-36 - The foltowi~g co~catiom from the Plamning ~irectar~_relative kQ rezoni~g referrals,
<br />w~s read:
<br />
<br /> '~At its regular mqnth'iy,meeting bn May 5, 1964~ the City Pl~nn/fig~Commisslo~reviewed again and
<br />acted upon the follow!rig ~o rezoning applicmtions, wh%ch you direc, ted back to the~ommissio~or further
<br /> study and the introduction of addit~sal inf~ma%i~n by %he a~pli~nts': ~
<br />
<br /> Z-64-1 Petition of Mary D. Lee ~o rezone property descried as follows: Beginfling app~oximately
<br />345' east of the northeast corner' of Turnpike Road and Kings Highway; thenee east approxima~ely 210' along
<br />Turnpike Road; thence northwest approximately 175'; thenpe southwest approximately 150'; thence northwest
<br />approximately 32'; thence southwest approximately 60'; thence southeast, hpproximatel~ 210' to the pein~t of
<br />origin; from. Residential R-75 to Commercial Q;~,~ ~ft~r considerable restudy of the ~at~er,. the Planning
<br />commission e~nsidered t~e additiona~ ~nf6rm~io~'s~mit~e~",by the-~ppi~hn%s and r'es6ived to recommend
<br />approval of the applica%i0n. ' ' -
<br /> Z-64L2 Petition of'~ober% F. Babb ~o rezone' property described` as foliows: Beginning a~ the
<br />southwest- corner of Elmhurst Lsae and Portsmouth Bou~ard~; thence, south a~bng E!mhurst L~ne approximately
<br />335'; thence west 284.~~' to ~ point; thence n6rthwest 36%~20' to ~ point;-thence ~orih'87~16" to~Portsm0uth
<br />BouIevard; thence e~st along~ Portsm~ath BDu~eva~d a~ox~mately 543".to the p~int'of origia; ~om'Residential
<br />R-75-S to Commercial C-2. ~fter considerable ~estu~y ~nd re~iew of the proposal.~as a request for C-i rather
<br />t'hanC32, tke~}~nni~g CommisDion resolved tore60mmend app~ova~ of C-! ~ubject~to yhe a~licant filing a plat
<br />of re~ord~howing S b~iiding~setback.~e, bf ih0,~ from boi~Po~ts~ou~h BbUteva~d. and' Elm~ur~t La~e~rior' to any
<br />action by CSty Council ...... on secoi~d rk~ad~ ~f an ordinande ~A :a6compii~sl~_~s~a~d ..... rezonlng. ~
<br />
<br /> Motion of' Mr~ Dilloh to concur in the ~ecommendation of the Plannib~ Commission to approve
<br />~etition Z 64-1 a~ ~ place the following ordinance' on. first reading, was ado'p~ed., Withou~ dissenting vo~:
<br />
<br /> "ZO~INGAMENDMENT ORDINANCE Z ~4-1"
<br />
<br /> Motson~of~Mr~ .... At~n$pn. to concur~in., the recommendation of ~he Planning Commission to approve
<br />Petition Z.64-2 a~d t~ p~ace the following .or~inance~om f%~S~ reading was adppted, wi%hou%'dissen~ing vote:
<br />
<br />"ZONING~ AMENDMENT DRDINANCE Z 6zt-2"
<br />
<br /> NEW BUSINESS'
<br />
<br />64-102 - The following eommuniCation from t~e ~tanni~g Direqtor was read:.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|