Laserfiche WebLink
March 30, 1999 <br /> <br />The City made a strong case for these funds and appreciates the work of our General <br />Assembly delegation, the Virginia Municipal League and others that produced these <br />state appropriations. However, it should be noted that the bulk of these funds are in <br />one-time appropriations and not in formula changes that would ensure the City an <br />additional revenue stream for years to come. Therefore, we should use these funds <br />with caution, applying them to non-recurring costs because of the uncertainty of future <br />funding. <br /> <br />The theme for this proposed fiscal year 1999-2000 operating budget might be cautious <br />optimism. We are certainly making progress in our major goal areas, and we have <br />identified the high priority items that need additional funding in the coming year. On the <br />other hand, we must continue to operate within the reality of our revenue stream and <br />other financial constraints, putting forth funds toward our priorities as they become <br />available. <br /> BACKLOG <br /> <br />In last year's budget message, I noted the difficulties of dealing with needs that have <br />accumulated throughout the City government because of funding shortfalls of the past. <br />Last year I paraphrased William Shakespeare and noted that "what is past is backlog." <br />Since the bard is in the Academy Award headlines these days, perhaps it is appropriate <br />to re-emphasize our backlog needs again this year. Indeed, while we have made some <br />progress in reducing backlog, it is still one of our most critical financial issues. <br /> <br />I must admit that, after meeting our core needs and funding some top priorities, there is <br />not as much left to go toward backlog as I had hoped. This is particularly true of <br />equipment needs. City departments requested $8.8 million in equipment needs. This <br />funding proposed addresses less than 40% of these total requests. <br /> <br />This proposed budget does include several items to address backlog. I am <br />recommending the transfer of $1 million to the Capital Improvement Plan budget to be <br />applied toward our facilities backlog. The budget also includes $1.4 million in computer <br />equipment, primarily to ensure that the City is prepared to meet Y2K requirements. And <br />we have created a fund of $1.5 million to provide for replacement of vehicles. And <br />finally, this budget includes $100,000 of increased funding for demolition of structures <br />that create a blighting influence in our neighborhoods. This recommendation supports <br />the continuing Clean Community efforts and will help in reducing our inventory of <br />structures that need removal. <br /> <br />While this budget includes no tax increases, I am recommending rate increases in the <br />water, sewer and stormwater accounts to help us address backlog. Although rate <br />increases are not a happy topic for our citizens, I am pleased to note that the net <br />increase for the average homeowner from these rate adjustments is approximately $1 <br />per week. <br /> <br />Water and Sewer System <br /> <br />The proposed rate increase for water usage is from the current rate of $2.15 to a new <br />rate of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons. The proposed rate increase for sewer is from the <br />current rate of $1.49 to a new rate of $1.81 per 1,000 gallons. For the average <br />residential user of just over 5,000 gallons of water a month, the average monthly <br />increase is $1.83 for water and $1.68 for sewer. Even with the proposed increase, our <br />water rate continues to be the lowest in Hampton Roads. [Figure 5]. <br /> <br />Figure 5: Water Rate Comparison <br /> <br />Chesapeake Norfolk Suffolk <br /> <br /> Virginia Beach Portsnlouth (proposed) <br />2.83 3.36 3.16 3.65 2.5O <br /> <br /> <br />