Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Watts: <br /> <br />Mr. Fleming: <br /> <br />Mr. Watts: <br />Mr. Wentz: <br /> <br />Mr. Fleming: <br />Mr. Wentz: <br /> <br />Mrs. Raymer: <br /> <br /> ! <br />"A lot of shadows are being thrown on landlords. It has been mentioned here tonight! <br />that when a t~ndlord comes in and takes over ~roperty, that the property immediatel~ <br />becomes deteriorated; and it is rented to lower types of people. This is not true. i <br />This is very, very unfair to a landlord, because I am a landlord, and I have many <br />friends who are landlords, and they strive very hard to put the best they can find <br />into their property. As we all know, every now and then, someone will get in that <br />we do not want. And this we try very ha~d to eliminate. Eventually, those people <br />are out. We screen our tenants very, very carefully. They fill applications out. <br />We check their former landlords before they are allowed to move into our apartments. <br />So I would ask everyone who is concerned to lean just a little bit lighter on the <br />landlords. Because we are not the worst persons in Park View." <br /> <br />"Being a representative of one of the largest landlords in the City, I sympathize <br />with you." <br /> <br />"Thank you. We need sympathy. Thank you very kindl~¥" <br /> <br />"I would point out that Mr. Fleming, in his representation of all the landlords, I'm <br />sure he's referring to the public ho~sing parks that are administered by the Public <br />Housing Authority. How many?" <br /> <br />"Nineteen hundred and seven." <br /> <br />"Nineteen hundred and seven units. Thank you Mr. Watts. The next request to speak <br />is Mrs. Mabel Raymer, Chairman of the New Town Community Development Committee. <br />Mrs. Raymer." <br /> <br />"Members of the City Council and members of the audience that are here also, I want <br />to add to what Mr. Eason has said. I am the Chairman of the same committee. We <br />do need housing. I think perhaps he over-emphasized the fact that we need multi- <br />housing. We want housing of any sort, and I do wish to take this opportunity to <br />thank the City Manager and the Mayor and all others who have really taken an in- <br />terest in improving the New Town area. The members of the Task Force hase worked <br />very hard and very diligently to get a plan before the Council, so that we would <br />be able to take full advantage of the Federal money available through the Federal <br />funds. I want to thank each one of them too. Various heads of the government have <br />been there in the commumity working with us, and the Health Department, and the <br />Recreation Department, and all our meetings have been Sol Cokes, and two of three <br />of the ones have been faithfully there at every one of our meetings that we've had <br />in this planning. Now one thing that I do want to bring out - we're very glad for <br />the housing. We do need it very badly. I, for one, will be very happy when we can <br />use some of the funds that are available to actually build houses rather than losin~ <br />these funds to tear down the housing. The only thing that i can see, the only ob- <br />jection that I have to using of Federal money zs to be taking private property from <br />individuals, now some of the...some are very glad to sell their property in this <br />area, however, again, I want to speak for the landlords., because the truth is that <br />the landlords are the only ones in this houszng that don't get a good deal. All <br />the rest do when the property is taken, but the landlords don't get the right amoun- <br />but the idea is, that I will be glad if a Federal law ~s ever passed that will not <br />allow private property to be taken from one property owner who has rental property, <br />to sell it to another millionaire, a multi-millionaire, because he can condemn to <br />build a project in certain blocks. I think that we need to strive for is some sort <br />of loan~system, as they had before through the Federal government where individuals <br />could be encouraged to build private houses and multi-family houses both. That's <br />what we really need in this area. I think it ~s a shame tear things down like <br />Wilkins' Hardware and the Mount Vernon Church and have to pay for all these out of <br />taxpayers' money. No private individual will do this. If a developer came in there <br />and he was going to have to pay a half a million for a building, or a hundred thou- <br />sm~d, he would let that building stand and he would build in another block; so we'r, <br />very glad.gfor all those that have worked so hard for the plan. We just wi~h that <br />any of the good houses that are left could be used, instead of taking the money, <br />for instance in the block...in this one right here, we have two brand new ones al- <br />ready built. Now, I'm very much against movzng those new houses. In this block <br />right down here...we have two ©homes especially, that are new homes, it's a very <br />highly populated block, which will cost a lot of money to be tearing down. What <br />I'm saying is, if we comld take one million dollars of this money,~of the 2.6 <br />million that is going to be available, you could build 50 twenty thousand dollar <br />homes. You could build possibly a hundred multi-family units out of that. One <br />million dollars, in other words, it would cost twenty thousand dollars apiece for <br />individual homes approximately; but if you were to have more than perhaps two or <br />three in there you might get seventy-five or more, seventy-five to a hundred out <br />of it, and the money would be so much better spent than bulldozing our natural <br />resources down. Every time we bulldoze a ... building that ~s usable, that is re- <br />pairable, we are grinding our natural resources into the ground and I feel that <br />five to ten years from now we'll wake up a realize that we don't have any prime <br />lumber left and that it's too late for our younger generation. So I do think that <br />we need to slow the bulldozers down, but do some building. You can go right throug] <br />New Town now and there are blocks, many of them, not just a few, there are ten or <br />fifteen blocks at least that there's not more than one or two buildings mn them. <br />And you can come this side of Jefferson School and you could go right from the <br />Effingham Street area, from Washington Street right straight through to Third Stree~ <br />and you wouldn't tear down more than six or eight houses in those four blocks. In <br />the proposed area, is tearing some down because some multi-millionaire wants the <br />property, they think they're going to be able to sell the property, next to the <br />Effingham Street project. In other words, they feel that some developer is gozng <br />to ~ant to be r~ght next to the Effingham Street project, so he's going to build <br /> <br /> <br />