Laserfiche WebLink
(1) A proffered or conditional zoning plan, zoning with a plan of development, preliminary or final <br />subdivision plat, preliminary or final site plan, or any document determined by the city to be <br />equivalent thereto (i) was approved by the city prior to July 1, 2012, (ii) provided a layout as defined in <br />9VAC25-875-670, (iii) will comply with the technical criteria of Article 4 of Part V of 9VAC25-875, and <br />(iv) has not been subsequently modified or amended in a manner resulting in an increase in the <br />amount of phosphorus leaving each point of discharge, and such that there is no increase in the <br />volume or rate of runoff; <br />(2) A permit has not been issued prior to July 1, 2014; and <br />(3) Land disturbance did not commence prior to July 1, 2014. <br />(c) Locality, state, and federal projects shall be grandfathered by the city and shall be subject to the technical <br />criteria of Article 4 of Part V of 9VAC25-875 provided: <br />(1) There has been an obligation of locality, state, or federal funding, in whole or in part, prior to July 1, <br />2012, or the department has approved a stormwater management plan prior to July 1, 2012; <br />(2) A permit has not been issued prior to July 1, 2014; and <br />(3) Land disturbance did not commence prior to July 1, 2014. <br />(d) Land disturbing activities grandfathered under subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall remain subject to <br />the technical criteria of Article 4 of Part V of 9VAC25-875 for one additional permit cycle. After such time, <br />portions of the project not under construction shall become subject to any new technical criteria adopted by <br />the board. <br />(e) In cases where governmental bonding or public debt financing has been issued for a project prior to July 1, <br />2012, such project shall be subject to the technical criteria of Article 4 of Part V of 9VAC25-875. <br />(f) Nothing in this section shall preclude an operator from constructing to a more stringent standard at his <br />discretion. <br />Section 11.1-13 Variances and exceptions. <br />(a) Variances to waive or modify any of the erosion and sediment control requirements of Article 2 (9VAC25- <br />875-540 et seq.) of Part V (9VAC25-875-470 et seq.) of the Regulation that are deemed inappropriate or too <br />restrictive for site conditions may be requested from the city under these conditions: <br />(1) At the time of plan submission, an applicant may request a variance to become part of the approved <br />erosion and sediment control plan. The applicant shall explain the reasons for requesting variances in <br />writing. Specific variances which are allowed by the city shall be documented in the plan. <br />(2) During construction, the person responsible for implementing the approved plan may request a <br />variance in writing from the city. The city shall respond in writing either approving or disapproving such <br />a request. If the city does not approve a variance within 10 days of receipt of the request, the request <br />shall be deemed to be disapproved. Following disapproval, the applicant may resubmit a variance <br />request with additional documentation. <br />(b) The city may grant exceptions to the provisions of Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V of the <br />Regulations. An exception may be granted provided that: (i) the exception is the minimum necessary to <br />afford relief; (ii) reasonable and appropriate conditions shall be imposed as necessary upon any exception <br />granted so that the intent of the VESMA and the Regulations are preserved; (iii) granting the exception will <br />not confer any special privileges that are denied in other similar circumstances, and (iv) exception requests <br />are not based upon conditions or circumstances that are self-imposed or self-created. <br />(c) Economic hardship alone is not a sufficient reason to grant an exception from the requirements of the <br />Regulations. <br />Page 18 of 27 <br />