My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008 Resolutions
Portsmouth-City-Attorney
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2008
>
2008 Resolutions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2008 11:13:17 AM
Creation date
4/15/2008 8:23:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />R-08-56 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPOINTING AN ADVISORY PANEL FOR PORTSMOUTH'S <br />COURT FACILITIES. <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, that the following named <br />persons and alternates are hereby appointed pursuant to Section 15.2-1643 ofthe Code of <br />Virginia to an advisory panel (the "Panel") to review the court facilities of the City of Portsmouth <br />and make recommendations to City Council and the Judge presiding over the case of <br />Commonwealth of Virginia v Holley, et al.: <br /> <br />Architects/professional engineers: <br />Aubrey Brock <br />Robert Miller <br />Joel Andre <br />Alternate: <br />Herbert Bondurant <br /> <br />Citizens: <br />Steve Carroll <br />Shirley Lassiter <br />Alternates: <br />James Ellis <br />Bernard Griffin <br /> <br />In the event that a person appointed is unable to serve, an alternate as duly designated above shall <br />assume the duties of that person. <br /> <br />1. Circuit Court: City Council has already determined that the present Circuit Court facilities are <br />to be replaced. There are two alternative buildings at two different locations under consideration <br />for the replacement facilities. The role of the Panel shall be to compare these two buildings and <br />locations with regard to their suitability, efficiency, and ability to serve the public and the judicial <br />system. To this end, the Panel shall address: <br /> <br />a. How urgent it is to have a replacement facility completed, and the estimated <br />completion time for each of the two alternatives. <br /> <br />b. The estimated cost for each of the two alternatives. <br /> <br />c. The potential for relocating and consolidating all Portsmouth courts at a future time for <br />each of the two alternatives. <br /> <br />d. Security provisions to safeguard court personnel, participants and the public. <br /> <br />e, Efficient layout and circulation patterns to maximize public access, promote efficient <br />operations, and accommodate the diverse users. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.